Attorneys negotiating a major settlement that could reshape the business model of college sports have submitted new language to their agreement after the judge in the case ordered the association and the players in the case to go back to the

Most of the revisions aim to better define the term “booster” and what constitutes the pay-for-play inducements the NCAA hopes to eliminate.

The NCAA and plaintiff attorneys in the most significant antitrust case in college sports history have agreed to amended language in a settlement that the two parties hope will be approved by a federal judge as early as this week.