Poems written by ChatGPT in the style of William Shakespeare get a better response from most (human) readers than the original ones do, according to the latest research to question the uniqueness of human artistic creativity.

A study in Nature finds that participants couldn't distinguish AI drafts from works by 10 famous poets. And the participants also preferred the AI's writings.

If all the world’s a stage and all the men and women merely players, where does that leave non-human figures, like artificial intelligence chatbots? As it turns out, A.I. can hold its own against humans—even the Bard himself—when it comes to writing poetry.

Readers are unable to reliably differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry and are more likely to prefer AI poems, according to new research published in Scientific Reports. This tendency to rate AI poetry positively may be due to readers mistaking the complexity of human-written verse for incoherence created by AI and an underestimation of how human-like generative AI can appear.

A new study finds that people prefer poems written by ChatGPT, a chatbot, over those written by human writers.

The air is thick with tension, My mind is a tangled mess, The weight of my emotions Is heavy on my chest. This apparently Plath-like verse was produced by GPT3.5 in response to the prompt “write a short poem in the style of Sylvia Plath”.